<Blush> I guess it just never really occurred to me to consider that the film might look completely unexposed to the machine. I'm not a night sky shooter.
Looked at that way, I can understand how that would happen. I guess a guy would need a camera that printed data between frames and then he'd still have to talk to the folks before they processed the film. Thanks for turning on the light. Len --- ----- Original Message ----- From: "William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 5:25 PM Subject: Re: RE: developing Leonid shots > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Len Paris" < > Subject: Re: RE: developing Leonid shots > > > > Interesting. You'd think that the clear space between > pictures > > would give the machine a clue. > > Unfortunately, often the entire film is clear space, with no > visible frame delineation. This happens a lot with pictures such > as meteor showers, fireworks and theatre/ concerts. We just give > the film back to the custome uncut, hand them sissors and > sleeving and let them do it themselves on the light table. > William Robb > > > > Len > > --- > > > > > Machine prints & machine can't find edge of the > picture...too > > much black for automatic printing. > - > This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, > go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to > visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
