I can't for the life of me understand why a bunch of pundits' praise or whatever is significant at all. Why care what they say unless you're working for Pentax marketing?
Godfrey - www.gdgphoto.com On May 15, 2008, at 4:51 PM, John Coyle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The UK's Amateur Photographer" had its usual biased summary of it's > testing: > the article said that basically the jpeg's suck at any ISO, that noise > levels are unacceptable at 400 ISO and above, and that using > "highlight tone > priority" slows the camera down noticeably. But the reviewer still > gave the > camera 86% overall, the same as the Nikon D60 and the Alpha 350! > > > John Coyle > Brisbane, Australia > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf > Of > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, 16 May 2008 3:21 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: OT: CanOFF EOS 450D Iso Test > > http://www.fotovilag.hu/teszt/canon/Canon-450D/canon450d-iso.htm > > Kinda sucks above ISO 400. > > (the page is in hungarian but the pictures are universal :D) > > Cheers, > .t > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and > follow the directions. > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above > and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
