Oh, sure, Derby, People who goes really in deep on equipment technology rarely is able to maintain the same level when it comes to actual pictures.
Actually, what I think is that there are 2 different 'hobbies': - Photography: taking, showing, looking at pictures, talk and comment them. - Photo equipment: collect and test equipment, follow the industry news, discuss about it, complain... Everyone has a certain amount of both hobbies, but the ones you mention are really biased towards the second one. In my case I would say that I am quite balanced, so maybe that's why I kind of regret loosing content of one of them here. >As much as I like to fondle gear myself, I find those to bleat on about equipment shortcomings tend to be those who have the least to say photographically. As Rod Serling would say, case in point... http://ricehigh.blogspot.com/2008_01_01_archive.html (his only non-test chart photos posted on the web, AFAICS) Equipment news is tomorrow's recycling. Photographic insight is timeless Derby -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://members.iinet.net.au/~derbyc -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. ______________________________________________ Enviado desde Correo Yahoo! La bandeja de entrada más inteligente. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
