I was at a hotel for a conference yesterday, there was a wedding scheduled at the same time. The photographer was using something similar. Damned annoying thing, looked like it wasted a lot of light under the conditions he was using it. A Lumiquest soft box would have been a better choice.
Cotty wrote: > On 8/6/08, David Savage, discombobulated, unleashed: > > >> This idea probably isn't new to most of you, but it was to me when I saw it: >> >> <http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3132/2559816153_6fc7234e37_o.jpg> >> K10D, V 125mm f2.5 Macro, 1/180 @ f5.6, ISO 200, AF-540 FGZ >> >> Very simple idea. I'm not too sure how effective it is though. >> > > LOL > > Cute. Mind you, no less daft than a newspaper snapper I know who uses > one of these: > > <http://jyanlun.free.fr/images/Lambency_4-a.jpg> > > Whenever I bump into him, I am always minded to say "Cheers!" > > -- Vote for Cthulhu. Why settle for a lesser evil... -- Dr. Jerry Pournelle -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
