Cotty wrote: > On 15/6/08, P. J. Alling, discombobulated, unleashed: > > >> Still a bit more than I'd want to pay for a camera of it's >> capabilities. (Plus my supply of Leica lenses is limited...) >> > > It's an M mount, but I own no Leica lenses. > > Both my lenses are M39 with an adapter on each, and compare more than > favourably with Leica glass. > > <http://www.luminous-landscape.com/reviews/lenses/fastlensreview.shtml> > > This is true. IMHO Voigtlander lenses compare very favourably to Pentax lenses on the cost/performance curve. I love the 31mm Ltd, but I think the CV 35/1.2 is just as spectacular a performer and at roughly the same price. Much praise has been lavished by Cotty (and myself) on the CV 28/1.9 which I now use as my lieutenant shooter in low light (with the 77mm ltd). At $A500 by the time it gets to Australia, I think it is a bargain.
The camera is just a box. As Mr Robb says, lenses are where it's at. D -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://members.iinet.net.au/~derbyc -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
