Thanks Bruce. In fact, he didn't really push her in the first shot. I
just picked up on the arm position. I'll take another look at the
brightness in the second shot, but it looked good on my monitor and
the histogram.
{ai;
On Jun 29, 2008, at 1:08 PM, Bruce Dayton wrote:
> Without the explanation the first shot doesn't quite come through.
> It isn't obvious that she was pushed to get going. The second shot
> stands on it's own and portrays the fun and excitement that she is
> having. The second shot does seem a overly bright.
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Bruce
>
>
> Saturday, June 28, 2008, 6:43:41 AM, you wrote:
>
> PS> A little shove:
>
> PS> http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=7462614&size=lg
>
> PS> And she's off:
>
> PS> http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=7462612&size=lg
>
> PS> To get what I wanted here called for two trips down the hill.
> On the
> PS> first shot, I needed fill because the boy was in shadow, and I
> wanted
> PS> to minimize DOF. So it's shot with direct flash at 1:1, ISO
> 200, f3.2
> PS> at 1/2000th. For the second I wanted motion blur, so I went to ISO
> PS> 100 (turning EDR off), f20 at 1/60th. Lots of fun.
> PS> Paul
>
>
>
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above
> and follow the directions.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
