Well, your wish is my command, occasionally anyway. It does need a bit more snap, but even a little more contrast was too much no matter how much I played around with it. However a bit more "micro contrast" seems to have worked wonders. Anyone who hasn't heard about adjusting "micro contrast" wondering what I'm talking about should try it out. I've read about it in a couple of tutorials. It uses the Photoshop USM tool, set to 20% 50 pixels, 0 threshold. Sometimes these settings do exactly what you want, sometimes you have to play with them a bit. If anyone wants to see the difference just click on the picture. Doing that will cycle between the original and the new version.
http://www.mindspring.com/~distilfink/PESO%20--%20oldfriendsii.html Doug Brewer wrote: > Jack Davis wrote: > >> Terrific, Peter! One of the best yet posted. >> >> Jack >> >> >> --- On Mon, 6/30/08, P. J. Alling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> >> >>> From: P. J. Alling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> Subject: PESO -- Old Friends >>> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <[email protected]> >>> Date: Monday, June 30, 2008, 7:20 PM >>> Says it all. >>> >>> http://www.mindspring.com/~distilfink/PESO%20--%20oldfriends.html >>> > > I agree. This is one of your best shots. It could use a touch more > contrast, I think, but it's still a good one. > > -- Vote for Cthulhu. Why settle for a lesser evil... -- Dr. Jerry Pournelle -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
