Michel Carrère-Gée wrote:
> Derby Chang a écrit :
>   
>> Hi kids,
>>
>>  From the why-because-I-can department, acquired a cheapie M39 to M42 
>> adapter today. Amused myself trying out a Leica-Pentax macro setup 
>> (obviously, since there ain't no infinity focus). Not much in the way of 
>> focus range, and there is that annoying infinity lock to content with. 
>> But the results a somewhat pleasing.
>>
>> http://members.iinet.net.au/~derbyc/08_07/08_07_leitax/index.htm
>>   
>>     
> Here a Penca ! :-D
>
> http://cgi.ebay.fr/PENTAX-SMC-L-43mm-1-9-SPECIAL-43-50mm-view-fit-LEICA_W0QQitemZ250264864669
>  
>   
Only if it's mounted on a Leica. 

If you mount it on a Voightlander it's a Pentlander.
If you mount it on a Rollie it's a Pentie.
If you mount it on a Zeiss Icon it's a Pentacon?
If you mount it on a Epson it's a Pentson.
If you mount it on a Canon it's a Penton.
If you could mount it on a  Contax it  would be a Pentax????

And worst of all if you mounted it on FED it would have to be a Fed-tax...
>
>
>   


-- 
Vote for Cthulhu. Why settle for a lesser evil...
   -- Dr. Jerry Pournelle 


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to