There's no pint in asking. What I do is environmentally friendly, what others do is not. That's the rule.
or the actual answer, not very. AlunFoto wrote: > Hmm... > Contact copies from negatives the size of, like, 1x2 meters. > So how environmentally friendly is the negative production? > > Jostein > > > 2008/7/7 Derby Chang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >> Exposure takes over a week, and print stability isn't all that great, >> but no nasty chemicals to pour down the drain afterwards. >> >> http://www.creativereview.co.uk/crblog/grass-art/ >> >> D >> >> -- >> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> http://members.iinet.net.au/~derbyc >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> [email protected] >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and >> follow the directions. >> >> > > > > -- You get further with a kind word and a gun, than with a kind word alone. --Al Capone. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
