I stand by my original statement... Dave
2008/7/17 John Francis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > My guess is this was a suggestion to Adam that arguing > with you-know-who (YOU-KNOW-WHO?) is a waste of time. > > On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 06:15:24PM -0500, Gonz wrote: >> My reaction exactly. Someone took one too many happy pills....or not >> enough..... >> >> >> >> On 7/15/08, Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > Huh?? >> > >> > >> > On Jul 15, 2008, at 11:45 PM, William Robb wrote: >> > >> > > Or not. >> > > One of the really nice things about gmail is that I no longer get >> > > into debates with idiots. The >> > > other thing is that threads that go to trash due to participant >> > > filtering end up as a nice >> > > easily followed web page. Anyway, this is digression at it's best. >> > > That is, if digression can be at it's best. >> > > But, I digress. >> > > >> > > Counting the caveats, I >> > > see....One...Two...Three...Four...Five...Six...Seven...Eight...Nine... >> > > Ten... either caveats, >> > > false presumptions or made up bits to forward an ever changing >> > > argument. >> > > Adam, How the hell do you expect to hit a target that moves faster >> > > than an email gets delivered? >> > > >> > > William Robb -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
