On Jul 19, 2008, at 3:37 PM, ann sanfedele wrote: > Matthew, I"m on smugmug too -- as you have few shots there I guess you > are just getting on...
Been on there for a couple years but don't post a ton. Mostly just put up snapshots for the family to view. You comment is funny as I keep *meaning* to put a lot more effort into organizing my smugmug space. :-) > I couldnt open your site from the link when in Netscape 7.0 because > you > are using the smugmug > style first page --of course, I then got there through firefox and it > was fine... > Everything there was lovely to look at - prefer the surf to the > sunset, > but that's just me > the travel to Japan stuff was really nice... a sense of where you are. Thanks a lot! > I opted to have the actualy dimensions of my stuff in the thumbnail > size > and don't use the > smugmug style usually because of the browser problems. Hadn't been aware of their browser incompatibility. > Just curious if you chose to have the square thumbs or just took what > you were dealt? > smugmug guys seem to think it looks "more professional" I've resisted > getting on Andy's case about it. > I really don't care for it - I want the thumbnails to be the same > "shape" as the real photos - > My feeling is if I had wanted square shots I'd have shot that way or > cropped the shots myself. I actually prefer the square thumbs as it adds a more uniform grid to the display. I was always slightly bothered by the thumbnail grid when the original aspect ratio was in use and the page contained a mix of portrait and landscape orientations. I can see both sides of the argument, on the one hand some folks want their thumbs pure and others would rather see a more uniform UI. Glad it is an option though. > anyway, nice work there Thanks again. Matthew -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
