Normally, without seeing the images, I would automatically say; "the more subtle version". Here, you have a unique set of elements which, together can produce a truly ethereal impression and I'm not sure you should pass it up.(?) Just something to think about. File 'em both.
Jack --- On Sun, 7/20/08, Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > From: Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: PESO: Morning (Revised) > To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <[email protected]> > Date: Sunday, July 20, 2008, 5:31 AM > I did a new conversion of this shot. Less saturation, warmer > light, > less sharpening, and a bit of burning in of the brighter > elements. > It's here: > > http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=7582506&size=lg > > And here's the original "Velveetasized" > version: > http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=7581535&size=lg > > The original is more surreal, which isn't necessarily > wrong, but I > think I prefer the more subtle version. What say you? > > Paul > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link > directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
