frank theriault wrote: > On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 2:29 PM, Joseph McAllister <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Do you know how much fun it is for those of us who get the digest, and >> I imagine even those who get each individual email, to have to go >> through this kind of junk every day? Can't your email software creat a >> reply from a selected bit of an email? >> >> The following is a message from one person, and as far as I can tell, >> nary a line of new text was inserted! >> >> C'mon. Let's pay attention, please! My carpal tunnel is acting up >> already. >> >> Joseph (a natural born whiner) >> >> > > That was a good whine, Joseph (but a worthy one). > > I agree. It's so easy to snip off all superfluous material so that > when replying one only sees your reply plus the post that you're > actually replying to. Seeing entire threads replicated time after > time, ever-growing as one scrolls through threads is a pia for those > of us who get individual e-mails, too. It's a waste of bandwidth. > > cheers, > frank > >
Except pun threads :) On the other hand, can I add a whinge about snipping too much, especially the web links in a GESO/PESO? I often miss an orignal post, but manage to catch it later on from a reply. Oh, and it would be great if the PESO/GESO were left in the subject line so my filters work. D -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://members.iinet.net.au/~derbyc -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
