> On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 3:24 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> It seems to me however, that it is a nice attempt and that in a couple >>> months this micro4/3 may indeed be a very interesting market segment. >> >> The whole M4/3 system is still walks in baby-shoes. In 1975 when Pentax >> created the Pentax K bayonett all of the older Pentax lenses (M42 Taks) >> was useable with limitations... Did anyone complain? :) > > Pentax Forum. > > Dave
I mean back in 1975... :D Pentax Forum will always complain about something :D That's why we use Pentax... we want to get to perfection as close as possible :D But since we can't get to the total perfection we complain! No camera is perfect, but Pentax is pretty close :D :D :D .t -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
