Hi Toine, How is the F 135/2.8 on the K20D? I ask because I have the FA 135/2.8, when I used it recently it seemed well below what I was used to on the K10D, after testing I discoverd it has a pronounced forward focus on the K20D that no amount of AF adjust can rectify. I remember dropping a lens some time back but I don't remember which one! Maybe I need to send the FA 135 in for service.
John ________________________________________ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Toine [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 21 September 2008 08:57 To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: DA 55-300 I have it and posted the small review Subash mentioned in the archive. Maybe the 60-250 is delayed because Pentax needs to outperform the 55-300. The corner sharpness needs some small improvement, that's all. Highly recommended. It outperforms most of my older glass like the FA 80-320, FA100-300, even the F135/2.8 and F70-210 are retired now. On Sat, Sep 20, 2008 at 4:00 AM, Cory Waters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Who has the 55-300? Like it? > > CW > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
