Frantisek Vlcek wrote: > In that case, an Armoured Personel Carrier seems to be a bit safer :) > except for the consumption in gallons per mile, not miles per gallon > ;(
I saw a program on TV a couple of weeks back which had a piece on the space shuttle. Liquid fuel consumption during takeoff was measured in something like gallons per foot. I've forgotten the numbers though. Cheers, - Dave David A. Mann, B.E. (Elec) http://www.digistar.com/~dmann/ "Why is it that if an adult behaves like a child they lock him up, while children are allowed to run free on the streets?" -- Garfield - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
