Understood.
Boris
Paul Stenquist wrote:
Far less fringing is the most obvious advantage of the DA* lenses in
terms of image quality. Sharpness and resolution are great, but I
obviously haven't made specific and direct comparisons. But as I noted,
DA* autofocus is considerably better as well, particularly in continuous
mode where the in-lens motor seems to offer distinct advantages over the
camera driven lenses.
Paul
On Sep 30, 2008, at 12:25 PM, Boris Liberman wrote:
Paul, can you please elaborate in what precisely aspects of image
quality (or should I say print quality) your DA* lenses outperform the
comparable film lenses?
Thanks.
Boris
Paul Stenquist wrote:
My film lenses are fine on digital, but the DA* lenses are
outstanding. I rarely use anything other than the 50-135 and 16-50
these days. They're fast and sharp, and the USM autofocus beats the
screwdriver autofocus system hands down.
Paul
On Sep 30, 2008, at 12:05 PM, Boris Liberman wrote:
I should like to agree here.
My film limited lenses are swell on digital. Naturally, I should
never want even to think about mounting DA 21 on my MZ-6.
Boris
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
