Thanks Paul. Your wedding photos are good and full of poses for me to remember. I suppose I could shoot some weddings, but the post processing of the ones I shot in the dim church were a headache. The incandescent lights gave everything a yellow tint that I had trouble removing. It took me quite a while to get 60 photos together that I was happy enough to give away. Regards, Bob S.
On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 9:10 PM, Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You've both done some very nice work. I love the dance floor shot on Rick's > gallery and this one on Bob's: > http://picasaweb.google.com/rf.sullivan/DianaEricWeddingPhotos#5252234006687202210. > Lots of other good ones as well. If you have the time to spare, you should > both consider getting out there and making some money shooting weddings. It > can easily pay for some lenses and bodies. > > I've posted 72 of the 357 pics I converted and delivered from my last > wedding. This was a tough one, because I was prepared to shoot an outdoor > wedding but heavy rain forced the ceremony inside -- in the banquet hall > where the reception would be held. Very few options for portraits and a > tight venue for the ceremony. But everyone had fun, and they are happy with > the pics. > > http://photo.net/photodb/folder?folder_id=862803 > > I shot weddings quite a few weddings thirty years ago but had long ago given > it up. I'm doing some now because it's money there for the plucking, and > it's a good photographic exercise. Of course the first time a mother beats > me up, I'm out of there:-). But so far, it's been good. > > On Oct 1, 2008, at 4:33 PM, Bob Sullivan wrote: > >> Rick, >> You've inspired me to show some wedding photos that I shot 9/6/08. >> They were of the neighbor's daughter - same age as my own daughter who >> was a bridesmaid. >> The deal was the same as yours. I sat in the 3rd row and just shot >> quietly. A gift of sorts... >> I used the K20D and the A85/1.4 in the dark...think focusing problems. >> I later added the AF540 flash with that light sphere at the reception. >> It makes a good addition to a flash package, & thanks Paul S. for the >> recommendation. >> Here are a few of the keepers. >> >> http://picasaweb.google.com/rf.sullivan/DianaEricWeddingPhotos# >> >> Comments and observations are welcome! >> Regards, Bob S. >> >> On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 9:21 AM, Rick Womer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> >>> Our niece got married a month ago, and of course I brought my camera >>> along. My shooting position was limited to the aisle seat in the third row >>> of the chapel, but I got some reasonable shots anyway. >>> >>> http://photo.net/photodb/folder?folder_id=865503 >>> >>> K10D and FA 24-90, ISO 560-800, RAW via LR. The 16-45 didn't give me the >>> "reach" I needed, and the 24-90 worked nicely for the purpose. That is >>> still my favorite lens. >>> >>> Rick >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>> [email protected] >>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and >>> follow the directions. >>> >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> [email protected] >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and >> follow the directions. > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and > follow the directions. > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
