Boy, those last couple of choices really make the decision hard
<grin>.  I used to shoot 67ii's (had two of them) and most of the
lenses.  I let them go back when they actually had some value.  So
I'm saying that I wouldn't bother with that equipment at this point
(unless you really love using it).

Even though you have lots of film, you still have to pay for
processing.  At least for color, I think that is still in a downward
spiral.  This one has really got to be your call.  The camera
manufacturers are pretty much gone from the film market which is a
good indication as to where it is headed.

With the amount of lenses and such you have, I think I would stick
with Pentax Digital for the time being.

-- 
Best regards,
Bruce


Monday, October 6, 2008, 1:55:09 PM, you wrote:

JM> It turns out that my insurance coverage (still haven't found the  
JM> actual policy - just coverage limits) is replacement value. With a  
JM> good addendum.

JM> Once my equipment's replacement costs are estimated by an independent
JM> company (I hope) I will be paid that amount without question for my  
JM> loss ($500 deductible). As I replace the pieces that I can from the  
JM> used market if I can find them, anything that costs me more that the  
JM> estimate will be paid for based on the receipts I tender. If it is no
JM> longer manufactured or reasonably unobtainable, I can replace the old
JM> equipment with new items that equal to or come close to the lost items
JM> in specification, and I will then be paid the difference.

JM> So I'm asking for recommendations from the crew. Keeping in mind that
JM> I have a K100, a K10, a K20, a PZ-1P, three LX bodies and ALL the  
JM> accessories every made for it, about 25 K-mount full frame lenses  
JM> left, a 67 135mm Macro left, a Pentax cassette loader for the 250  
JM> frame back for the LX, and a very small freezer full of bricks and  
JM> boxes and 100 ft rolls of 35mm and 120 film, and sheet film in 3  
JM> sizes. And don't forget, I'm 66 yrs. old, and statistics say will live
JM> only another ten years at best unless I lose 80 pounds and start a  
JM> program of vigorous daily exercise, in which case I'll most likely  
JM> live an additional one or two!

JM> What would a PDML'r do?

JM> Replace my rarely used 67 gear?  Y   N

JM> Replace my great 35mm lenses?   Y   N

JM> Buy new DA* optics for Digital        Y   N
JM> and sell my LXs and PZ-1p?

JM> Sell all the gear I now own and       Y   N
JM> get a Canon body + 2 lenses?

JM> Sell everything and invest it all in    Y   N
JM>   the stock market?

JM> Sell everything, and spend it all       Y   N
JM> on hookers?

JM> Take up drink as a final solution?    Y   N


JM> Joseph McAllister
JM> Pentaxian


JM> --
JM> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
JM> [email protected]
JM> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
JM> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
follow the directions.




--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to