Subash, I love the temple but don't know about the rocks. Their size as photographed makes them a dominant part of the photo. I wondered what their actual dimensions were. I suppose they are much smaller than the temple? This leades to a bit of visual confusion on my part.
The age of the temple is amazing - no earthquakes I presume. We have nothing so old in North America, only cliff dwellings in the southwest. I think the age is older than most churches in Europe, funny how religion mobilized both societies to build. Regards, Bob S. On Sun, Oct 19, 2008 at 10:02 AM, Subash <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > hi, > > an old one taken with a p&s, panasonic fz20. a shiva temple, originally > built in the 7th century AD. the structure as it is now probably built > in the 12/13th century. still in use today, almost the only in hampi, > india. > > http://picasaweb.google.com/pdml.live/PESO#5258878789005299186 > > > more info here: > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virupaksha_Temple > > appreciate your comments, regards, subash > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
