No.
On Nov 7, 2008, at 8:23 PM, Joseph McAllister wrote:
Paul, you are using the same pumped up words that you are accusing
those who disagree with you. "'lunatic" "bad information"
"juvenile silliness"
Do you consider yourself the "lunatic" right? What impartial jury
deemed the information "bad"? What separates your "juvenile
silliness" from my juvenile silliness?
If you're correct and the rest of us wrong, prove it. In court. or
Off list....
Joseph McAllister
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Nov 7, 2008, at 15:13 , PN Stenquist wrote:
The "lying" is very much a creation of the lunatic left. Yes, major
mistakes were made, and they were based on bad information. But the
name calling is just so much juvenile silliness.
Paul
On Nov 7, 2008, at 6:10 PM, Bob W wrote:
The suit had two parts:
1.) An application for an injunction to postpone the election.
This is clearly impossible as it directly conflicts with the >
Constitutionally mandated day for the election, this is not
open to >
interpretation.
It seems from what I've been reading and hearing for the
past several
years that the Constitution has become open to
interpretation, if not
outright suspension by the sitting President.
Methinks a left leaning media and blogosphere tend to blow
things out of proportion. Especially when they don't like
the sitting President.
It's not the sitting they dislike, it's the lying.
Bob
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above
and follow the directions.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
