On Sun, 9 Nov 2008 15:20:01 +0100 Toine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > After reading this review I wouldn't dare buying this lens. As a > reference Photozone trashed the 50-200 completely. For pixelpeeping > fun I got this lens a few days ago for very little money (thanks > photozone!). The 50-200 is simply amazing (if you stop it down one or > two steps). > They also think my other lenses are middle of the road or worse. ROFL!
:-) fwiw, it *is* one point of reference, another being actually seeing photos from the lenses one is interested in, in forums like these. i tend to agree with you about the 50-200. got one for myself not too long ago in spite of the thrashing it got from photozone, mainly after seeing photos here by Paul and others though he doesn't seem to be using it much these days.... and i believe photozone reviews have traditionally had a mixed reception here... :-) regards, subash -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
