That's a bad thing to do, since once you claim them they're yours, DNA
testing not withstanding...
Bob W wrote:
I don't have any kids either, but I know people who do. You could claim to be
the biological father of someone else's kids, and while the paternity claim, DNA
testing and subsequent lawsuits take place, get the kid to take some pictures
for submission. If later it turns out that you're not the daddy after all, hey,
that's a win-win because you got onto the PUG and you don't have to pay the
college fees.
Bob
On reflection the only one I have a problem with is Pentax
Kids. I don't have a kid, unless you want to count four
legged ones, and though he does have his own camera, he lacks
opposable thumbs so using it is problematic, (and it's not a
Pentax, but then film availability isn't so much of a problem).
http://www.mindspring.com/~webster26/tourist.html
Scott Loveless wrote:
Here's the list for 2009 unless a bunch of people really
don't like something.
1. Posed
2. Monochrome
3. Abstract
4. Water
5. Roots
6. Travel
7. Aviation
8. Night and Astro-photography
9. Transportation
10. Vernacular or snapshot
11. Pentax Kids! (pictures your kids have taken)
12. Film
Opinions most welcome. The November PUG will be up in a
couple hours.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
--
You get further with a kind word and a gun, than with a kind word alone.
--Al Capone.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
