In a message dated 12/3/2008 6:54:41 P.M. Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Four views of St. Louis's best-known landmark:
Reflection: http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=8317497 (K10D, DA 16-45, polarizer, ISO 400, f/9.5 @ 1/90, handheld, RAW via LR2) Minimalist: http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=8317495 (same everything, but f/19 @ 1/30. I have no idea why I used that exposure...) Sort of abstract: http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=8317489&size=lg (DA 50-200, polarizer, ISO 400, f/5.6 @ 1/125. More sensible.) Southern base minimalist: http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=8317498 (DA 16-45, polarizer, ISO 280, f/5.6 @ 1/90) Stories that Illinois (across the river) was going to erect a giant statue of Lincoln holding a croquet mallet are entirely apocryphal. ============ Actually, I like the last the best. I was in St. Louis once and took pictures of the arch. It's hard to get something original or different. So your last one is. Marnie aka Doe :-) --------------------------------------------- Warning: I am now filtering my email, so you may be censored. **************Make your life easier with all your friends, email, and favorite sites in one place. Try it now. (http://www.aol.com/?optin=new-dp&icid=aolcom40vanity&ncid=emlcntaolcom00000010) -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
