I corrected the maximum in camera motion blur using focus in two axis,
(notice the oblique reference to "Tooo! funny"), to get it that sharp.
David J Brooks wrote:
Both angles are good, but look very soft to me.
Dave
On Sun, Dec 7, 2008 at 2:09 AM, P. J. Alling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The United Illuminating Company was one of two power companies in
Connecticut. It used to generate it's own power but under deregulation
became a common carrier. One of it's old plants is still sitting unused on
New Haven Harbor. Here are two different treatments.
http://home.earthlink.net/~morephotos/PESO%20--%20uiv.html
http://home.earthlink.net/~morephotos/PESO%20--%20uih.html
Equipment: Pentax *ist-Ds/smc Pentax A 24mm f2.8
Note: Both these shots were hand held braced against a sold bridge
abutment, yet I still ended up with lots of camera movement. I'm not really
happy with that, and I think I'll go back to take these shots again with a
tripod.
As usual comments are welcome but may be totally ignored.
--
You get further with a kind word and a gun, than with a kind word alone.
--Al Capone.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
follow the directions.
--
You get further with a kind word and a gun, than with a kind word alone.
--Al Capone.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.