In a message dated 12/16/2008 9:25:12 A.M.  Pacific Standard Time, 
[email protected] writes:
Ah.  So you're saying  that it's perfectly fine for you to choose to base
your response on just one  unconfirmed and unsubstantiated news report
because it fits in nicely with  your pre-conceived ideas, rather than
investing any time and effort  attempting to find out the true facts?

Not a role model I'd have chosen,  personally, but that's up to you.

==============
Okay, that's not  true. I googled and found the news story all over the Net. 

Here it  appears in the Washington Post. And evidentially a Time sof London 
reporter went  under cover to the UK  warehouse.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/12/16/AR200812160083
0.html

I  like Amazon, and I don't like seeing this. But not liking seeing it 
doesn't mean  I will close my eyes to it and go into denial.

It is possible worker  abuse is a problem at only one UK warehouse. But that 
is still not  good.

Personally, having sold third party through Amazon, a lot, I find  it 
credible (as a third party used bookseller). And I am going to keep my eyes  
pealed 
to see if any more stories come up in the future.

Marnie  
---------------------------------------------
Warning: I am now filtering  my email, so you may be censored.  

**************Make your life easier with all your friends, email, and 
favorite sites in one place.  Try it now. 
(http://www.aol.com/?optin=new-dp&icid=aolcom40vanity&ncid=emlcntaolcom00000010)

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to