Not necessarily so. Might the ploy be to encourage more usage - processing -- for "cheap film" and encourage use of K film where competitive product might have been used otherwise........and protect list pricing during what me a rather slow period for sales? Kodak seems to have had a hard time over the last few years, I keep hoping they'll do better.
Otis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Let's see, give them a $600 discount off the scanner or give them $600 in > film which costs us only $250... An accounting/accountant mentality as the > $600 in film ultimately comes out of your total US Market sales. > > So are there any stand alone dust/scratch removal programs like Nikon's > 'digital ice' > which could be added to this scanner? With a $300 net price, we are starting > to talk about a price I could afford. > > Regards, Bob S. > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > << I agree. I'm guessing that they've realized that the scanner is overpriced > compared to the competition, but I can't imagine why they're doing this > instead > of just reducing the price. >> > - > This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, > go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to > visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
