Is it just me or is the FA 35/2.0 bokeh pretty awful? The author acknowleges the double-imaging of the bokeh wide open (which is bad enough) but then claims it gets good at 2.8 and very good at 4 and beyond, whereas it seems from his images to be really ugly and harsh to me at 2.8, and still ugly at 4.0. I actually feel a little sea-sick looking at it. The bokeh in every shot looks un-natural and unpleasant. Perhaps it's my computer, or something about the subjects he shot or the presentation of the images? I've been thinking about picking up the FA 35/2 but now I don't know.
-RSW >Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2001 05:11:40 -0800 >From: "Steven Larson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: Re: M lens testimonial > >Hi Paul, was it this one: >http://www.takinami.com/yoshihiko/photo/index.html >Steve Larson _________________________________________________________________ MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
