Hi, Jaume, Thanks for taking the time to critique my image this month. All of your criticisms were and are valid. I knew it wasn't a particularly good photograph when I submitted it, but of the 15 or 20 that I took of the building and it's sign (different angles and distances, bracketing like mad), I opted for that one.
I think what I should have done was to scout out what I was going to do before I left the house with my camera, but I didn't. I thought I'd try "spontaneity", and just leave the house and see what comes up. Didn't work too well this time! ;-) Thanks again. regards, frank Jaume Lahuerta wrote: > �Helpless� by Frank Theriault: > > Well, it is a picture very related with the month�s > subject and with the moment in which it was done. You > were very strict with the rules for this month, but > this affected to the quality of the result. Maybe > someone / something indicating the city where you took > the picture, maybe showing the whole building (at > least the lower part of it) would improve the final > result. > But, you chose to shot at the equinox precise moment > instead of looking for a more balanced picture. Thanks > for your contribution! > -- "The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist fears it is true." -J. Robert Oppenheimer - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
