Thanks, Peter. I'm certainly glad I asked. 
Pleasing remarks.

Jack


--- On Sun, 1/25/09, Peter Alling <[email protected]> wrote:

> From: Peter Alling <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: FA*28-70 f/2.8 AL
> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <[email protected]>
> Date: Sunday, January 25, 2009, 10:52 AM
> KEH wants a lot more for that lens when it's in stock. 
> It may be comparable to the DA* but it the the DA* lens
> doesn't have the Cachet of the FA*.  I expect that you
> can get closer to twice that on e-bay even in todays
> depressed market.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> >From: Bob Sullivan <[email protected]>
> >Sent: Jan 25, 2009 1:46 PM
> >To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]>
> >Subject: Re: FA*28-70 f/2.8 AL
> >
> >Jack,
> >
> >$750 or $1,000 is my guess, given the fluctuating
> currency rates.
> >The DA16-50mm f2.8 ED-AL is listed at $630 as a
> comparable lens.
> >I like the FA*28-70 f2.8 AL better for the day when we
> have full frame again.
> >Weights are 600g vs 800g according to Boz's site.
> >
> >Like you, I find the DA16-45/4 is a nice carry around
> lens - light & snappy.
> >But it is softer than my 31mm and 77mm limiteds.
> >I didn't think that was the case with the
> FA*28-70/2.8.
> >Whoever buys it will get a great lens.
> >
> >Regards,  Bob S.
> >
> >On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 10:02 AM, Jack Davis
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> Didn't think this would ever happen, but
> I'm considering selling my FA*28~70 f/2.8 AL lens.
> >> I did a fairly serious comparison of its images to
> those produced by my DA 16~45 f/4 and feel it slightly out
> performs it. I'm beginning to feel that The small
> difference isn't significant enough to justify my
> packing it around (a bit heavy) and not using it.
> >> This is the lens I mentioned having dropped with
> frigid fingers a few falls back while in Grand Teton NP
> while attempting to mount it. It dropped maybe 12-14"
> onto a rock wall at the Snake River Overlook. A mounting
> ring flange was bent just enough that the lens wouldn't
> mount.
> >> When I returned home, I sent it to Pentax CO. for
> repair and CLA.
> >> The mounting ring was replaced, of course, and it
> has worked as new since.
> >> Am attaching a picture of along with one of the
> slightly scuffed hood (not dented) and one showing three
> small dings at the base including one on the edge of the
> aperture ring.
> >> I need help with a price. Will happily read your
> giggle ideas, but at some point I'll need to enter base
> bid when posted on eBay..if it comes to that.
> >>
> >> Thanks for your help!
> >>
> >> Jack
> >>
> >>
> http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=379
> >>
> >>
> http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=380
> >>
> >>
> http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=381
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> >> [email protected]
> >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> >> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the
> link directly above and follow the directions.
> >>
> >
> >--
> >PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> >[email protected]
> >http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> >to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link
> directly above and follow the directions.
> 
> 
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link
> directly above and follow the directions.


      

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to