On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 4:01 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > Didn't mean that (lots of us share photos not shot with Pentax). :-) Long > threads discussing panny. Think it's gone a bit far. Should be Pentax. > > I mean I have a Canon, I shoot Canon almost exclusively, but I only mention > it briefly on list. Maybe I should start discussing my sweet, sweet Canon > XSi, which I like a great deal -- even if other think Canon is crap. > > THAT's what I meant.
I tend to filter out equipment talk anyway. I mean I like my Pentax gear, but hell, I'm using such old technology (my *istD is positively stone age by current standards, and I'm still shoot regularly with 20 year old MF lenses) that I'm sure I could get similar results no matter what system I used. I've never really cared much for the technical side of the list. To me, talking about the G1 is equivalent to talking about the K20D. I'm not that interested, but neither does it bother me. Besides, you know how it is: boys will be boys. This is the latest "toy" out there - they'll eventually get bored of it when the "next latest thing" comes along... ;-) cheers, frank -- "Sharpness is a bourgeois concept." -Henri Cartier-Bresson -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
