Maybe. But I'm not going to purchase any of them. Thanks though. ~Nick David Wright http://pedalingprose.wordpress.com/
--- On Sat, 2/7/09, JC OConnell <hifis...@gate.net> wrote: > From: JC OConnell <hifis...@gate.net> > Subject: RE: short tele primes > To: "'Pentax-Discuss Mail List'" <pdml@pdml.net> > Date: Saturday, February 7, 2009, 2:14 AM > the K85/1.8, K105/2.8 and K120/2.8 are better lenses... > > JC O'Connell > hifis...@gate.net > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] > On Behalf Of > Nick Wright > Sent: Friday, February 06, 2009 9:05 PM > To: pdml@pdml.net > Subject: short tele primes > > > > I'm looking at getting a fast tele prime. I'm > considering the M85/2, the > M100/2.8, and the M120/2.8. > > What are your thoughts about these lenses? Does anyone have > some samples > (specifically portraits) that I could take a look at? > > Thanks. > > ~Nick David Wright > http://pedalingprose.wordpress.com/ > > > > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link > directly above and > follow the directions. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link > directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
