I used the m100/2.8 for a while, sharp, small and lightweight lens (not
so sharp wide open, but so not bad either). Can't locate a sample photo
right now, sorry...
My lens developed a heavy fog into a double element, and I gave up
repair after the second attempt. I'd go for the m85 myself, as I own a
SMC Takumar 135/2.5. From memory, the m100 is sharper than the SMC Tak
135/2.5, but the bokeh is not so fine. Wide open, both lenses were a
little soft, up to 5.6 they are matched, and from 8 on the m100 is sharper.
Can't comment the m120 - but if I'm fairly happy with the 135.
LF
Nick Wright escreveu:
I'm looking at getting a fast tele prime. I'm considering the M85/2, the
M100/2.8, and the M120/2.8.
What are your thoughts about these lenses? Does anyone have some samples
(specifically portraits) that I could take a look at?
Thanks.
~Nick David Wright
http://pedalingprose.wordpress.com/
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
--
Luiz Felipe
luiz.felipe at techmit.com.br
http://techmit.com.br/luizfelipe/
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
