I shot 6x6 extensively for at least ten years, probably longer. Never
fell in love with it.
Paul
On Feb 18, 2009, at 8:29 PM, John Mullan wrote:
There are some advantages to a square format, just ask anyone who
has shot 2 1/4" x 2 1/4" for any extended period. While I love my
645 dearly for its large negative size, the square format is always
framed optimally. At 1.3 times the size of a 35mm negative
according to the article I guess that qualifies as medium format in
the digital world.
I would definitely look at it as a candidate to join my arsenal.
jm
----- Original Message ----- From: "John Celio" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2009 8:00 PM
Subject: Amusing square-format dSLR rumor
http://www.1001noisycameras.com/2009/02/wild-rumor-pentax-k3d-with-a-22mp-square-sensor-dslr.html
I don't know about you, but I think it would be a pretty neat
idea. I imagine it would be strange to get used to a square view
while using a non-MF camera.
I doubt there's an ounce of truth to it, though.
John
--
http://www.neovenator.com
http://www.cafepress.com/calemp
http://www.cafepress.com/neovenatorphoto
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above
and follow the directions.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above
and follow the directions.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
