In a message dated 2/22/2009 8:48:12 P.M. Pacific Standard Time, [email protected] writes: > ========== > Right idea, wrong crop. Just go for a square crop. Hey, we're digital now > and we don't have to do "standard" sized photos unless we want to. > > Marnie :-) >
Umm, that is a square. Ira ============ You lost too much of the bottom. More like this http://www.mapphotography.com/crop.jpg That's a standard size, 5 x 7, well, any standard 35mm size. A tiny bit off the bottom, more off the sky, since the sky isn't doing much above the peaks. If you want more of the sky, to the top, a crop similar to that, I guess. No it wouldn't be square, it would be rectangular and a non-standard size. But I think by losing the bottom you lose too much. The dark framing is nice. Just my .02. Marnie :-) --------------------------------------------- Warning: I am now filtering my email, so you may be censored. **************You're invited to Hollywood's biggest party: Get Oscars updates, red carpet pics and more at Moviefone. (http://movies.aol.com/oscars-academy-awards?ncid=emlcntusmovi00000001) -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
