In a message dated 2/23/2009 1:39:55 P.M. Pacific Standard Time, [email protected] writes: I'm not working on RAW files. These were shot on film and put on a CD by Wally World.
Which is one major reason I'm looking to get my own scanner. Everything that I get back from either of the local one hour labs (WalMart or Walgreens) is extremely overexposed on the CD. I even intentionally underexposed a shot by three stops at one point just to make sure the problem didn't lie with me and the image on the CD came back washed out. It's extraordinarily frustrating. ~Nick David Wright http://pedalingprose.wordpress.com/ ============== Aha! Hmmm, well I have Epson, not bad, packed up, and I liked it quite a bit (since it's packed up I can't tell you the model number, but the 4400 or something like that). I mainly used it for scanning slides, so I am not real positive how it scanned film. On the whole, though, that Epson series was a pretty decent series of flatbed scanners. Good luck finding one. Marnie :-) I AM SO GLAD I don't do film anymore, no lab I used ever got it right. Well, got it right consistently. --------------------------------------------- Warning: I am now filtering my email, so you may be censored. **************You're invited to Hollywood's biggest party: Get Oscars updates, red carpet pics and more at Moviefone. (http://movies.aol.com/oscars-academy-awards?ncid=emlcntusmovi00000001) -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
