On Feb 24, 2009, at 14:25 , Mark Roberts wrote:
Joseph McAllister wrote:
On Feb 24, 2009, at 13:24 , Mark Roberts wrote:
http://www.robertstech.com/pages/fotoblog/7d406406.htm
A black & white medium format shot from GFM. I tried lightening it
up a bit, but decided I liked this dark look better. I wish I
could display it *really* big - the detail is really marvelous -
but we have to deal with bandwidth and monitor size limitations :)
It's pitiful at that diminuitive size. What could be detail looks
like it's been over sharpened.
Nope. Almost no sharpening applied (and that, before resizing down).
Wasn't implying that it was over sharpened, just pleading for an
online copy that I could swim around in, sorta like snorkling around
in the shallows off Cabo San Lucas, as opposed to looking through the
wrong end of binoculars.
Buck up to the rail and give us a couple thousand pixels wide!
About 1400 x 1900 is what I have at the moment. My MF scanner is
only 1125 dpi. I'm a member of Pittsburgh Filmmakers, though, and
have access to their 4000 dpi MF film scanner.
1400 x 1900 would do just fine. What I see online is about like a 5 x
7 print. Only 500 wide x 666 high. 88K.
Please? off list a copy at that larger size if you would.
Joseph McAllister
Lots of gear, not much time
http://gallery.me.com/jomac
http://web.me.com/jomac/show.me/Blog/Blog.html
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
