I'd second that, in it's class it can't be bettered for the money, even the build is decent. I found it better than my FA 80-320 and F 100-300 which I've now sold, both. I've tried various Sigmas but non copared well. The Tamron made a nice combination with the DA 16-45 for travel.
John ________________________________________ From: [email protected] [[email protected]] On Behalf Of Thibouille [[email protected]] Sent: 26 February 2009 17:10 To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: Pentax FA-J 75~300 Zoom Forget it. It had bad reputation on film and even worse on digital. really, find the cheap Tamron 70-300, it will serve you better. On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 5:30 PM, Walter Hamler <[email protected]> wrote: > Is it any good? > There is one on the web for 80.00 > > Walt > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. > -- Thibault Massart aka Thibouille ---------------------- Photo: K10D,Z1,SuperA,KX,MX, P30t and KR-10x ;) ... Thinkpad: X23+UB,X60+UB Programing: D7 user (trying out D2007) -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
