Nick David Wright wrote:
Oh I read the entire thing.

But just to give you a little background on myself ...

I'm the guy who refuses to own a car and rides a bicycle everywhere. I'm also 
the guy that mows my lawn with a scythe and a manual power reel mower. And I'm 
also the guy that heats my home with wood. Oh and I'm the guy that refuses to 
buy a chainsaw and cuts all my firewood with an axe.

So in some regards I am a confirmed luddite. ;;)

As is/was, in some regards, the "ink-stained wretch" who wrote that article...

And then I come in and hop on my WiFi laptop and post digitally scanned 
photographs on the internet.

There you go.

Buying and owning books is *not* Luddite now.
It will be before long.

The hardware has to get both better and cheaper. It has to overcome the visual limitations of current display technology and it has to get to the point at which the reader device is no more expensive than a typical (hardcover) book. But both of these things are going to happen.

When it reaches the point at which the visual qualities are reasonably close to paper and the cost of dropping your electronic reader into the bath tub or leaving it behind on the train/plain is no greater than losing a book... then we'll have a tipping point exactly like what we've all seen in digital photography. If you're arguing against the future of electronic books and shooting pictures with a digital camera you're engaging in denial, pure and simple.

A lot of mobile (cell) phones are given away free now with service commitments of no more than two years. That's likely to be the model for electronic books eventually.

Everything Bob Walkden said about the pleasures of books is and will continue to be true. It's also beside the point: It won't stop the advancement of electronic books any more than the pleasures of film stopped digital cameras.


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to