On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 11:33 PM, Ken Waller <[email protected]> wrote: > Sounds like a tax refund to me....
Wazzz that.?? Dave > > Kenneth Waller > http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f > > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Cory Waters" <[email protected]> > Subject: Silly question (enablement) > > >> As a purely hypothetical , lets just say you had maybe $2500 to spend free >> and clear of any guilt. Lets also say you were inclined to spend said clams >> on new lenses. We'll say you have a K10, the DA 50-200 & 18-55, a FA 28-105 >> f3.2-4.5, and a FA 50 1.7 (there are some other manual focus lenses but >> we're focusing on newer stuff). Further, lets assume that we're going to buy >> new lenses from an online retailer (probably Amazon) and they need to be >> available for sale now or at least in a couple months. Assume we shoot lots >> of family-type shots (kids, vacations, scenic stuff from camping trips, >> etc), some sports (racing, football), and some more artsy or flower stuff on >> occasion. How would you spend it? >> >> I've been thinking: >> 90/100 macro (from whom?) >> 70-200 2.8 (Sigma? A TC to go with it?) >> DA* 16-50 (it's maybe too big for walk around/vacation and I wish it went >> out to 85mm) >> Mmmmm Limited. But 43 or 31? 77? The new 55? >> >> Cory >> quite possibly counting unborn-chickens > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and > follow the directions. > -- Equine Photography www.caughtinmotion.com http://brooksinthecountry.blogspot.com/ Ontario Canada -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
