> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Paul Stenquist
> Sent: Sunday, December 23, 2001 10:33 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: 6x7 LENSES
>
>
> William Robb wrote:
> >
> > Whatever. In my own small collection of 6x7 lenses, I would
> > place the 135 macro sharpest, then the 105mm, then the 90mm LS,
> > then the 45mm, then the 75mm. The 75mm is also very flare prone,
> > in my tests. I definitely have an old version 75mm f/4.5. They
> > may well have improved it recently, but I would definitely avoid
> > the old version.
> >
> Thanks for the rundown. A lot of people have high praise for the 135
> macro. It's also quite pricey, but the 105 seems to be a relative
> bargain. However, I think I'm going to look for a 45 or 55. That will
> give me a good landscape lens to go with the 150, which hopefully will
> prove a good portrait lens.
> -
150 is too short for ports IMHO. That equiv to a 75 mm lens
in 35mm. 200 would be much better and possibly even 300.
JCO
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
