Cory, I seem to remember some one trying to do this on the doom and
gloom forum, with out success.

I got the impression that the multy exposure mode didi not like it if
things moved around to much.

I tried to do a swirl effect last year, with around 8-10 frames and it
didi not work.

Sounds like the layer method might be best.

Hey listen to me, i almost sound like i know something.;-0

Dave

On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 5:45 PM, Cory Waters <[email protected]> wrote:
> I heard an interview on a podcast with this woman from Iceland:
> http://www.rebekkagudleifs.com/  One of her series of photos that gained her
> a lot of popularity is called Multiplicity.  In this series, there are
> multiple instances of a single person (usually the photographer herself) in
> each image.  I found the images interesting and decided to try one with my
> daughter Emily being the subject.  (here's the fail part)  I tried using the
> K10's multiple exposure mode and took five shots with Emily in a different
> place on the swing set in each.  The resulting image is a very nice shot of
> the swing set with no trace of Emily...  I suppose the camera averages out
> the scene.  In four of the five shots there is no Emily at any given
> location so the end result is no kid. I have to say, it was a little creepy
> to behold.   I'm sure the desired result could have been achieved in Photo
> shop but I was excited about the idea of doing it "in camera".  Bummer.
>
> Cory
>
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
> follow the directions.
>



-- 
Equine Photography
www.caughtinmotion.com
http://brooksinthecountry.blogspot.com/
Ontario Canada

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to