Great shot Bob! Lovely light!
Charles, I had both and the m100 is sharper wide open, matched from 5.6
and sharper again past 11. In the end I kept the 135 2.5 and started
looking for an 85 I never managed to buy.
LF
Charles Robinson escreveu:
On Mar 14, 2009, at 16:03, Bob Sullivan wrote:
I now have an M 100 f2.8 that I should put up for sale.
Is the image quality of the M100 markedly better than that of the
Takumar 135 f2.5?
-Charles
--
Charles Robinson - [email protected]
Minneapolis, MN
http://charles.robinsontwins.org
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
follow the directions.
--
Luiz Felipe
luiz.felipe at techmit.com.br
http://techmit.com.br/luizfelipe/
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
