I agree. I don't mind doing high volume jobs as long as the dollar per hour figure works for me. Similarly, a single shot that requires extensive setup may bring in the same amount of revenue as 500 shots that are the result of mass production shooting. Without film and processing costs to consider, it all comes down to getting paid for your time. Paul ----- "Bruce Dayton" <[email protected]> wrote:
> These days, I am seeing the value of the 'image' really going down. > I tend to charge for my time up front whenever possible rather than > trying to charge for the image, as most people now just aren't > willing to pay anything for it. They seem somewhat ok with paying > for a service provided, however. > > -- > Best regards, > Bruce > > > Friday, March 20, 2009, 9:49:49 AM, you wrote: > > WR> I just ask them what they do for a living and immediately start > pumping them > WR> for information. > WR> It usually gets the point across. > WR> But it doesn't generate sales. > > WR> William Robb > > > WR> ----- Original Message ----- > WR> From: "ann sanfedele" > WR> Subject: Re: Wedding photography, starting price? > > > > >> The panel moderator asked if he could have the "wonderful photo" I > took of > >> him for his website... I said if he > >> wanted the photo on his site he could buy a jpg file from me on a > "pay > >> what you will' basis , but he could also > >> just include a link on his web site to the photo on my web site for > no > >> fee. > > > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and > follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
