Doug,
I feel your pain - to some extent. Whenever I took photos at a
running/triathlon race I was always wary of the buffer on the Pentax
camera in use. Fortunately, this not often the case when I shoot.
I am currently trying to shoot in RAW and this is something that I have
to keep in mind when I do shoot.
I am thinking of attending a car show tomorrow and this may come into
play since you have to shoot the car in question while no one is around
it...
César
Panama City, Florida
Doug Franklin wrote:
Bruce Dayton wrote:
Many talk of jumping ship, but
not too many actually do. What happens is you have to differentiate
between a justifiable need and a want.
I'd love, in some ways, to jump ship to Canon for their (reputedly)
better high-speed-action performance. [Frankly I haven't done the
research, I'm just using Canon as an example.] But I'd have to
replace a 400/5.6 APO Macro, an F* 300/4.5, and an FA* 200/2.8, plus
whatever the "other brand" has for analogues to the 16-45 or 16-50 and
the 50-200. Plus bodies (two). That's more than I paid for the last
race car we bought. It's more than any daily driver I've ever
bought. It's more than all but one vehicle I've ever bought, and
that's the truck to tow the race rig. Ain't gonna freakin' happen
until my Pentax gear dies.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
