I meant to say, "sharp detail, even at f4." My finger got lost on its way
to the 4.

Paul Stenquist wrote:

> Well, I shot a few test rolls with the 6x7 and SMC Tak 150/2.8. So far
> I'm very satisfied with this lens and absolutely in love with the
> camera. I posted a hand held shot (f4/1/250) that I exposed yesterday. I
> printed this same shot as an 11 x 14, and I'm very pleased. Sharp
> detail, even at f5, nice color, and rather attractive bokeh. I scanned
> it at 2000 dpi to yield a file size of about 103 meg. I then printed it
> at 1440. Tomorrow, Im going to  shoot the same subject at f11 off a
> stout tripod and see how it looks. I think I'll scan it at 4000, which
> will give me a file of about 250 meg. I want to see how that prints. It
> should be something like 550 ppi at 11 x 14. I stuck the lo-res jpeg
> coversion of this scan in the upper corner of my crude web pate. It's at
> http://home.earthlink.net/~pnstenquist
> Paul
> -
> This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
> go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
> visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .

Reply via email to