Well, short-sighted I am... wearing lenses since forever. :-)
And you're correct, since everything now is made with some degree of
photoshop. And before that, with layers of nylon if needed. I just can't
shake some of my old beliefs... wich would place this sharp lens as
product, not portrait. But then, small DOF was hardly needed shooting
products - er, here comes my old beliefs again...
LF
Thibouille escreveu:
Well PS can take care of that. Going the other way is just a tad more
difficult so wanting a lens to be soft because it is used to take
portraits is, IMO, at least short-sighted.
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 8:23 PM, Luiz Felipe <[email protected]> wrote:
William, that's a sharp lens - maybe too sharp for portrait?
LF
William Robb escreveu:
OK, it isn't much, and you'd never be able to drink him cute, but he's a
good friend, even with the choice in camera gear.
http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/pictures/55-14.html
Technical:
K20 @ ISO 640.
DA*55/1.4 @ f/3.2
1/40 second.
William Robb
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
follow the directions.
--
Luiz Felipe
luiz.felipe at techmit.com.br
http://techmit.com.br/luizfelipe/
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
follow the directions.
--
Luiz Felipe
luiz.felipe at techmit.com.br
http://techmit.com.br/luizfelipe/
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
