I said "shutup" because it's obvious his response was just a devil's
advocate post, as usual is very biased and opinionated, was very negative,
and contains little if anything constructive.

I wasn't saying "shutup" as a directive.  I was saying it more as a "good
grief".  Everyone has the right to an opinion.

However this thread was being enjoyed by those who enjoy their PZ-1p's.
Pal's post was nothing more than attempt to bash the PZ-1p.

And... I don't believe he knows what he's talking about, especially when it
comes to getting into the "mind of Pentax".

This having been said... for anyone out there looking for a great camera at
a great price.  Check out the PZ-1p while you can still get them.

Pal will probably think a rush to buy bargain basement PZ-1p's will signal
the demise of the MZ-S.


Tom C.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Robert Harris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2001 4:05 PM
Subject: Re: PZ-1p review


> aimcompute wrote:
>
> > Oh shutup Pal,
>
>
> Why should he shut up? He makes perfect sense on, this issue at least.
>
>
> > Not only many of us, but other camera reviewers don't agree with you.
>
>
> These delusions tend to attract crowds. :)
>
> I share Pal's views but shut up about the Z1/Z1-p a long time ago,
> shouted down by the sycophants.
>
>
> > The fact it didn't do well may be part marketing, part Nikon/Canon
mentality
> > of the consumer-masses.
>
>
> And part because it looks like an ungainly brick.
>
> Bob
> -
> This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
> go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
> visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .

Reply via email to