Mark wrote:
> The objection to having to repeatedly refer to a camera manual seems poorly > thought out. You consult the manual once for each of the simple operations > Paal cites, and you're done for life if you have any memory cells in your > brain at all. The same thing applies absolutely equally to the MZ-S or > PZ-1p manuals, or to the manuals for any other camera, for that matter. Which isn't true. No manual is neded for majority of functions of the MZ-S. Shutterspeeds, aperture, metering mode, light on LCD panel, drive mode are all self evident on the MZ-S whereas on the Z-1p you need to consult the manual to know which dial to press with what button and in what direction. I'm not denying that the Z-1p can be learn, just the tiring myth that Z-1p is easier or more intuitive in use something thats utterly wrong. For some people this make a difference, for others it don't. Still the MZ-S is easier in use. Yes, custom function need consulting with manual in both cases. On both my camera I set the custom setting once and for all when I received them. P�l - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
