On 27 Dec 2001 at 19:55, Tom Rittenhouse wrote: > That's cheating ;-). If dye subs, which were far better than inkjets to > start, have improved as much as inkjets the prints must be spectacular.
I understand that dye sublimation prints generally have a more compressed colour gamut and lower contrast. The photo prints generally look nice but don't send it any type of line-art or composites including text and photos, edge definition sux. But you could prove me wrong :-) Cheers, Rob Studdert HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA Tel +61-2-9554-4110 UTC(GMT) +10 Hours [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://members.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications.html - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
